List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Prepare colour sample | 1.1 | Identify required sample properties |
| 1.2 | Select sample preparation method |
| 1.3 | Identify required sample preparation conditions |
| 1.4 | Adjust and control sample preparation conditions |
| 1.5 | Prepare colour sample |
|
2 | Compare colour sample to standard in accordance with procedures | 2.1 | Identify light conditions for comparison |
| 2.2 | Compare colour sample to standard using 'colour computer' and/or by eye |
| 2.3 | Reconcile data from comparison |
|
3 | Recommend adjustments to batch | 3.1 | Estimate the colourant additions needed to bring batch to standard |
| 3.2 | Recommend additions to relevant personnel |
| 3.3 | Recommend additional mixing/processing requirements to procedure |
| 3.4 | Repeat sample preparation, colour matching and adjustment until correct colour is obtained |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
control sample preparation conditions, including one or more of:
temperature
drying rate
time
pressure
volume
discriminate differences in hue, value and chroma (or colour/tone, lightness/shade and saturation)
recognise colourant addition and colourant dispersion differences
make judgements based on:
perceptibility
acceptability/tolerance
grade 1, 2 or 3 match as required by specification
interpolate and extrapolate data
calculate required adjustments consistent with the colour match data
recommend adjustments that avoid overshooting and minimise the number of adjustments to bring the batch into specification.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
types and application of sample preparation methods, such as:
draw down
spraying
brushing
moulding
casting
milling
pressing
the impact of sample properties, including surface finish, gloss, thickness, opacity, substrate properties on sample preparation methods and conditions
the effect of a change of light conditions on the appearance of the colour for the pigment combination used as relevant to the product
the impact of opacity on colour as relevant to the product
types and application of colourants relevant to the application.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operations
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
must include the adjustment of a commercial scale batch and equipment to meet a suitable colour standard
may use industry-based simulation for part of the unit particularly where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.